Sunday, January 10, 2010

This earlier writing has now become credible in many Internet media sources

Did the Portuguese police kidnap Madeleine Mc Cann? 

The Spanish media Internet source JM Noticias [JM News] at published on February 8, 2008 an article entitled in Spanish: ¿Secuestro un policia a Madeleine Mc Cann? Translation: Did a policeman kidnap Madeleine Mc Cann? According to the article, while the elite-controlled media have been publishing speculations on Madeleine's case, the author of a blog had predicted that the Portuguese police would declare Gerry and Kate Mc Cann "arguidos" [suspects] as a tactic to conceal the implication of police officers in the abduction and disappearance of Madeleine on May 3, 2007. In the blog titled "master of fate" some unusual and suspicious photographs show Gerry and Kate Mc Cann being closely watched by a policeman shortly before Madeleine vanished. The author of the blog who goes by the anonymous "Inu Yasha" assures his audience that [...] "the Portuguese police have not really being looking for Maddie because they know where she is. The police have instead dedicated to create a hostile environment against her parents so they can charge them with the dead of their daughter." Mr. "Yasha" further continuos by stating that [...] " instead of looking for the little girl since they know where she is, the Portuguese police have been preparing the terrain by working very intensively on creating a favourable public opinion with the end in mind to imprison both parents and close the case." The article inform that in his blog, the author wrote that the Portuguese police is repeating the same tricks used in an earlier and similar case in which the mother of another little girl who was also abducted and disappeared not far from Praia da Luz, was convicted without evidence after suffering great torture. "It is almost exactly to the case of Leonor Cipriano who was convicted of murdering her daughter Joanna even though there was no proof that the child had died. I believe the little girl was abducted on orders by an international paedophile organisation with presence in Portugal. As in Joanna's case the final outcome in Madeleine's will be the same," wrote the author on his blog. Mr. " Yasha" also stated that in the suspicious pictures one can see Robert Murat in the company of the police and a Negro man that was spying on Madeleine before her abduction. In fact, the Negro appears in the background of a picture looking at Madeleine while she was playing with her father and the other two children. The blog is located at [in Spanish]. 

In our opinion, the information featured in the JM Noticias article on the contents of the blog is neither necessarily frivolous nor unfounded. If you would look into the numerous facts and details related to the Portuguese police performance on Madeleine's case since day one, you would probably conclude that it is now a puzzle with too many pieces all scattered and deliberately being kept that way by a sinister veil of secrecy. What or who is the Portuguese police protecting? The answer to this question can only be obtained by conducting a thorough investigation of the Portuguese police itself by an outside force. All the pieces of the puzzle need to be put in place for all to see and understand the truth related to the well-planned and executed abduction of Madeleine Mc Cann. Only then will her parents get the answers to the three questions:

1) Who abducted Madeleine?
2) Why?
3) Where is she being kept against her will?

Until the above-mentioned is done the actual situation of uncertainties will continue on while Madeleine suffers in God knows what conditions...


After studying some Portuguese history in contemporary times plus journalistic research on the possible connection between Madeleine's abduction, and the well-entrenched paedophilia and hard-core officialdom corruption in Portugal, we think there is a possibility that one or more member(s) of the Portuguese police were involved in the abduction. If this turns out to be the case it would not be a surprise at all. More information on related writings published here. Continuous research has produced an amount of information in different Internet media outlets pointing out to the Portuguese police involvement in the kidnapping and mysterious disappearance of the British child. Some publications even accuse the Portuguese police blatantly of her kidnapping. The Editor of this blog does not accuse anyone as some media sources are doing now, but very strongly suspect that individuals connected with the Portuguese officialdom are responsible for the crime. The characteristics surrounding the commission of the crime suggest that it was an abduction indeed but not carried out by a lone paedophile; it was a well organized criminal plan for specific purposes. We believe that time will confirm this theory.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

"The truth of a lie" book by Goncalo Amaral is a cover up and a project designed to cash-in on a tragedy

Goncalo Amaral's book "The truth of a lie" fails to show beyond doubts that his theory on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is true 

Taken into consideration the social implications that child abduction in general represent, and the awareness on this tragic reality in today's society the case of Madeleine McCann has generated thanks to the massive media exposure, we wish to express our independent and neutral views based on what is written on the English version of the book we obtained from the Gerry McCann Blog. We also take note on what we think is a poor translation of the book into English and therefore, our opinions are made according to how we understand the contents therein. In addition, we don't agree with the contents in Amaral's book nor we dignify his person, and our views and/or opinions are only out of real concern for child abduction in general and not only Madeleine McCann.

In a letter dated September 15, 2009 sent to Gerald and Kate McCann now published on this blog following the injunction against further distribution of Amaral's book, this group wrote the following statement contained in the letter: "His book is the ultimate manifestation of the success in twisting reality to his advantage while protecting the interests of those on behalf of whom the abduction of Madeleine McCann was executed with precision."

We wrote the above statement long before having an opportunity to read his book but now that we have, our reaffirmation to the essential substance of the statement is even greater. Our position is and will continue to be intransigent unless something or someone demonstrates to us why and how we are wrong. There are numerous parts in the book that shed light on the deliberate incompetence and corruption we have been writing about for some time which support of our views expressed in different writings published on our blog. One new element we have found in Amaral's book is his own depiction as a victim of others above his rank who forced him to leave not only the case but also the police institution as well. In a section titled "an investigation destined for the archives" in Chapter 1 he tells the reader about how he knew the case was on the verge of being closed by the police director because it […] "was beginning to undermine the police judiciaries and investigations in Portugal. Perhaps that was why it had to come to a close." We don't know how you interpret this but to us it shows gross police incompetence. To us it means that they don't have the know-how to deal with a case of such nature and their logic is to close it before their charade is "undermined." And what about the victim? We certainly don't mean to be an annoyance but will repeat it again-and-again as many times as necessary that since day one, there was no real interest by the Portuguese police to search for Madeleine McCann or the kidnapper, because they already knew why and how she was abducted and on whose behalf. What grounds do we have to make these statements? The book contents. We admit our surprised at the ease with which the author provide us with the support we need to back up our statements. We are no longer vulnerable to accusations of being inaccurate or false in our statements, because now we have the book to back up anything we may say or write on the subject. As feeble and fallacious as it is, the cornerstone of Amaral's claim is that Madeleine McCann die in the apartment and that her father transported the body somewhere to avoid responsibility for his daughter's death.

Amaral has declared on numerous times that he had the "honour" to have worked for the Portuguese police for twenty five years. The Policia Judiciaria [PJ] of Portugal has a reputation inside and outside the country, as being a very corrupted and inept police organisation in Europe; it is known to be an appendage of a judicial system unconditionally subordinated to a privileged elite class, who control the whole of Portuguese society with an iron fist wherein the social conditions are very similar to a third world country, that is, a small minority living in opulence while the great majority languish in grinding poverty. The poor people of Portugal regard the PJ as their ruthless bogeyman always ready to smash anyone challenging the present status quo in Portuguese society. Is this the police Amaral had the "honour" to work for twenty five years? And what about the savage beatings and torture of Joanna Cipriano's mother to force her into signing a confession?    Back to the McCann case.

The name Clint Van Zandt is regarded among the intelligence community of the United States [US] as a reputable and high quality professional. He has an impressive curriculum covering at least thirty years of intelligence work at the Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] the Federal Bureau of Investigations [FBI] and as a US Army counter-intelligence officer. Amaral can't even come near these qualifications. In an interview with a Journalist from NBC, he told the audience that the key element in the entire claim by Amaral is timing. He explained in detail how and why it would have been impossible for Gerry McCann, to have transported Madeleine's dead body --as Amaral claims-- to a distant area and bury her. For him to have buried his daughter's dead body, he would have needed a considerable amount of time to dig a hole on the ground. How could he have done this by himself without someone seeing him? And what about the group of friends he and his wife were dinning with? They would have noticed his prolonged absence and question his whereabouts. The facts show a complete different scenario than what Amaral and his supporters want us to believe. Later in the same section of Chapter 1 he concludes that "the closing of the case certainly serves someone's interest." We don't know whether or not he realised at the time that what he wrote only confirmed what is now obvious: There were powerful interests behind who wanted the case closed for reasons we still don't know yet. The whole book is full of contradictions and inconsistencies, but we don't think is worth going into more details while knowing that sooner than later, we will arrive at the same conclusion already expressed in other writings long before reading the book: Amaral's book is a cover up of the truth and a shameless opportunistic commercial endeavour to cash in on a tragedy.

Any person with decency must not believe nor support whatever he does in his effort to deny that Madeleine McCann was kidnapped on behalf of a specific individual and for specific reasons. Is the individual Jose Manuel Barroso? The Christopher Story Journalist Investigation Agency reported that it was him. [See related writings on this blog]